Institutional Ownership

Ownership > 100%

Ownership Information

Shares Outstanding

58,859,778

Short Interest Shares

5,793,518

Float (%)

89.34

Institutional Ownership (%)

64.26

Mutual Fund Ownership (%)

14.05

Insider Ownership (%)

10.66

Top 10 Instn Holders (%)

51.94

Ownership Activity - Total Positions

Ownership Options

Company	Shares	% Out	Value ($)	Reported	Change
BlackRock Inc.	7,217,986	12.26	21,220,879	9/30/2020	(69,067)
Wellington Management Group LLP	3,618,335	6.15	10,637,905	1/6/2021	531,950
M3F Inc.	3,524,637	5.99	10,362,433	9/30/2020	87,516
Vanguard Group Inc.	2,326,181	3.95	6,838,972	9/30/2020	(8,072)
Banc Funds Company LLC	2,145,576	3.65	6,307,993	9/30/2020	0
Royal Bank of Canada	2,023,084	3.44	5,947,867	9/30/2020	(5,389)
BHZ Capital Management LP	1,987,159	3.38	5,842,247	9/30/2020	56,446
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP	1,578,468	2.68	4,640,696	9/30/2020	(15,116)
Renaissance Technologies LLC	912,446	1.55	2,682,591	9/30/2020	(27,200)
Brandywine Global Investment Management LLC	896,034	1.52	2,634,340	9/30/2020	127,500
State Street Global Advisors Inc.	855,719	1.45	2,515,814	9/30/2020	(51,031)
Geode Capital Management LLC	679,971	1.16	1,999,115	9/30/2020	1,664
HBK Sorce Advisory LLC	605,672	1.03	1,780,676	9/30/2020	0
Northern Trust Global Investments	562,235	0.96	1,652,971	9/30/2020	(23,139)
Morgan Stanley	545,113	0.93	1,602,632	9/30/2020	2,652
Bank of America Corp.	540,678	0.92	1,589,593	9/30/2020	(4,734)
Goldman Sachs Group Inc.	220,807	0.38	649,173	9/30/2020	23,371
D.E. Shaw & Co. LP	195,572	0.33	574,982	9/30/2020	(120)
BNY Asset Management	176,880	0.30	520,027	9/30/2020	(17,914)
TIAA	174,598	0.30	513,318	9/30/2020	2,377

Displaying 1 to 20 (of 119)

Republic Bank

Institutional Ownership

Institutional Ownership

Total Positions

New Positions

Increased Positions

Decreased Positions

Soldout Positions

Net Change

List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:

Double-counting - On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.

Short Interest - A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.

A gap between 'as of' dates - In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.

Other possible reasons: a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions; b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues; c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.