Institutional Ownership

Ownership > 100%

Ownership Information

Shares Outstanding

58,842,153

Short Interest Shares

2,185,128

Float (%)

88.98

Institutional Ownership (%)

59.70

Mutual Fund Ownership (%)

15.32

Insider Ownership (%)

11.02

Top 10 Instn Holders (%)

46.25

Ownership Activity - Total Positions

Ownership Options

Company	Shares	% Out	Value ($)	Reported	Change
Wellington Management Group LLP	3,822,004	6.50	17,619,438	3/31/2019	274,493
BlackRock Inc.	3,307,132	5.62	15,245,879	3/31/2019	(42,038)
Wasatch Advisors Inc	2,780,974	4.73	12,820,290	3/31/2019	(266,125)
Vanguard Group Inc.	2,319,157	3.94	10,691,314	3/31/2019	9,139
Banc Funds Co. LLC	2,165,576	3.68	9,983,305	3/31/2019	40,000
FMR LLC	1,658,000	2.82	7,643,380	3/31/2019	(77,600)
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP	1,118,016	1.90	5,154,054	3/31/2019	164,621
State Street Global Advisors Inc.	898,618	1.53	4,142,629	3/31/2019	1,417
HBK Sorce Advisory LLC	605,672	1.03	2,792,148	3/31/2019	0
Northern Trust Global Investments	588,476	1.00	2,712,874	3/31/2019	3,283
Geode Capital Management LLC	580,877	0.99	2,677,843	3/31/2019	25,859
Deutsche Bank AG	544,039	0.92	2,508,020	3/31/2019	500,317
Phoenician Capital	468,495	0.80	2,159,762	3/31/2019	(260,994)
Basswood Capital Management LLC	460,937	0.78	2,124,920	3/31/2019	0
FSI Group LLC	434,515	0.74	2,003,114	3/31/2019	(2,879)
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc.	384,542	0.65	1,772,739	3/31/2019	9,684
UBS Asset Management AG	308,976	0.53	1,424,379	3/31/2019	(51,729)
Renaissance Technologies LLC	268,233	0.46	1,236,554	3/31/2019	112,500
BNY Asset Management	246,609	0.42	1,136,867	3/31/2019	(8,317)
Costello Asset Management, Inc.	179,610	0.31	828,002	3/31/2019	(22,535)

Displaying 1 to 20 (of 121)

Republic Bank

Institutional Ownership

Institutional Ownership

Total Positions

New Positions

Increased Positions

Decreased Positions

Soldout Positions

Net Change

List of possible reasons behind the infrequent cases where we have total institutional ownership that exceeds 100% of the common shares outstanding for a specific company:

Double-counting - On the 13-F filing, each institutional holder must report all securities over which they exercise sole or shared investment discretion. In cases where investment discretion is shared by more than one institution, care is generally taken to prevent double-counting, but there is always the exception. Another cause of double-counting is a company name change for the 13F filer where the holdings are accounted for under both filer names.

Short Interest - A large short interest amount affects the institutional ownership amount considerably because all shares that have been sold short appear as holdings in two separate portfolios. One institution has lent its shares to a short seller, while the same shares have been purchased by another reporting institution. Consequently, the institutional ownership percentage reflected in the 13-F filings is overstated as a percentage of total shares outstanding.

A gap between 'as of' dates - In the case where gaps between the 'as of' dates of the holdings and the shares outstanding arise, the percentage owned could be skewed due to a sharp increase/decrease in shares out. Again, this case doesn’t come up very often but the results are unavoidable.

Other possible reasons: a) An overlap occurs amongst reporting institutions; b) The 13F filing includes holdings other than common stock issues; c) Mutual fund money is co-advised and incorrectly reported by multiple institutions.